|
SP-2005-13
Review the Final Site Plan for the Lot 2, Andover Commercial Subdivision Spec. Building. Phil Meyer and Nick Staiv
presented the plan. Phil responded to the staff comments:
- Provide
details/ elevations of proposed monument sign. Phil said no monument
sign is planned. The owner wants to use a neon tube light block letter
wall sign.
- Provide
material samples. He showed the tan brick that will be used to wrap
around the south side. He said red brick will be used on the bottom of
the columns. The drivit material will be on the south and north ends of
the building. The east side of the building will still be a metal
building with the service doors. David Martine asked what the north
elevation would look like. Phil Meyer said it will be the same as the
south side.
- Provide
details for wall signage if any. Submitted tonight.
- Show
light standard locations on landscape plan. That is shown on the revised
plan.
- Provide
1 foot-candle minimum illumination on driveway approach. Revised
lighting plan shows this.
- Provide
1% minimum slope on rear drainage swale. Phil said he is working with
Les on this. He said they are at .8 % now along the east property line
and are requesting approval of the plan contingent upon the satisfaction
of staff for the drainage plan. Phil said Klausmeyer is ready to begin
building on Lot 2 now. He said the property will drain to the south down
to Commerce Street.
Doug
Allison asked if the 2 trees along Andover Road shown on the color landscape
plan are existing. Phil said they are existing trees and they are adding 2
more on the north end and 1 on the south end of the building. There was
discussion whether the 2 existing trees would need to be removed by the
construction of the 10’ sidewalk. Phil Meyer said they would be moved or
replaced if necessary. Les said the sidewalk could be routed around the
existing trees.
Doug
Allison asked if the brick canopy would clear the handicap ramp. Phil said he
was pretty confident that it would.
Jeff
Bridges asked Les if the Site Plan Committee could decide on the number of
trees required for the property then have the developer purchase the ones the
Committee wants. Phil Meyer said developers would balk at that idea.
David
Martine asked for the distance between
the sidewalk and the parking lot. Phil said 15 ½ feet from the right-of-way
to the parking lot.
David
asked about the dirt berm that exists now. Les said it is only 1-foot high.
Phil said there is no landscape berm planned for the site.
Doug
Allison asked how the trash would be handled on the site. Phil said the
containers will be kept in the rear of the building.
Jason
Mohler asked if a monument sign is
planned. Phil said not at this time.
Doug
Allison asked if the lighting plan is acceptable to staff. Les said the plan
is fine. Doug was concerned about using 30’ light poles. There was further
discussion about light pole height in Andover.
Doug
Allison asked about the 14’ eve height on the back, 19.8’ on the front, and
parapet above that with an elevation of 120’. He asked if the eve heights are
correct or should it be 122’. Phil said it should be 122’ eve height based
upon general scaling.
Doug
Allison asked about the red stripes. Phil said he did not know whether the
red is painted or not.
Doug
Allison said the south elevation is not attractive at all and needs some
breaking up. He also said proportions on the west elevations are wrong.
Jason
Mohler asked for the zoning of this
property. Les said it is B-6 Commercial. There was discussion about the
zoning of surrounding property.
David
Beaver asked about the metal cap on
the parapet. Phil said it is a synthetic plaster finish coat like the red
band of efis shown on the plan.
Doug
Allison asked if the landscape areas would be irrigated. Phil said they would
be.
David
Martine stated he owns the property to
the south of this applicants and he knows the owner. David said he has not
been in contact with the architects, new owners of the property, or the
contractors, and feels he can make a decision without bias.
David
Martine asked Les if all his concerns
have been satisfied. Les said yes they have been.
David
Martine made a motion to
approve the site plan as presented with the understanding the 2 existing
trees will be replaced if necessary. David Beaver seconded the motion. Motion
carried 4/1 with Doug Allison opposed.
|