|
SP-2001-02 Review of the
Site Plan for the Tony Durano office building at 825 W. Central Avenue.
Doug Allison stepped down from the Site Plan Review Committee and stated he
is presenting the information on behalf of Mr. Durano. Mr. Allison stated he
is with the firm of Wilson, Darnel and Mann, Architects. Mr. Allison stated
that the building would be an office for State Farm Insurance. This would be
located near the corner of Lakeside and Central Avenue. Mr. Allison stated
that the west 100’ of the property is given for a drainage easement. The
building will be placed tight along the drainage easement line and will be
placed south on the property to accommodate parking in front. Mr. Allison
stated the owner is interested in the future expansion at some point and that
is reasoning for the placement of this current building.
Mr. Allison stated that the
landscaping has been provided as recommended per the City’s Streetscapes
guidelines. He stated there are Autumn Purple Ash and Austrian Pines on the
west side of the building, 2 shade trees in the island areas, and 2 Austrian
Pines east of the drainage area. Mr. Allison stated that the owners would
like to trade the trees on the west side with the tall trees being in the
rear because of visibility concerns of the northwest corner of the building.
Mr. Allison stated that the
building would be a masonry veneer, with a split face block, with a burnished
block trim and red brick veneer. He stated that the south side of the
building would be lap siding.
Mr. Allison stated that the
signage proposed is a monument sign at then northeast corner of the property,
a 2’ square, back lit State Farm logo sign on the column of the building. He
is also proposing a non-lit aluminum all weather sign on the porch.
Chairman Freeman asked about the
grading plan. He asked if the design water surface is adequate for the
100-year storm. Mr. Mangus and Mr. Allison stated that it is.
Shawn King stated that he had a
comment on the choice of the lilac on the corner of the building. He stated
this would be bare and leafless in the winter and suggested the owner should
consider a Japanese Barberry or Juniper. He also stated that if the large
oak tree’s purpose is to provide shade he would suggest the Burr Oak, which
is more drought resistant.
Gary Israel asked if the monument
sign was to be done now or in the future. Mr. Allison stated Mr. Durano is
not sure but will probably be in the future. Mr. Israel asked if the area
for the sign would be grass. Mr. Allison stated that it would be grass in
the interim.
Gary Israel asked the other Committee
members if the Committee had been requiring planting sizes larger than 1
gallon. Mr. Mangus stated he had the same concerns as Mr. Israel regarding the planting sizes and the monument sign.
Gary Israel asked about the house
to the east and what screening was proposed for the property line. Mr.
Allison stated that owner has proposed a cedar fence for screening. Mr.
Mangus stated that the screening fence is on page SA-2 in the plans.
Don Kimble asked if this is a
future monument sign and if it is, why it isn’t being done now. Mr. Allison
stated that the applicant is not sure what sign he is wanting at this point.
The size is determined but not other aspects. Don Kimble stated the
landscaping should be done whether the sign is put in now or later.
Motion was made by Don Kimble
to approve the site plan as presented with the following conditions:
1. Any monument sign placed
in the future, if different than the one presented at this time, will be
brought for review before the Site Plan Review Committee and if the presented
monument sign is not installed now, landscaping will be done now.
2. The one-gallon size
planting will be increased to two-gallon size.
Les Mangus made the comment
that the plantings were on 12” centers, and the larger sized plantings will
cause the plantings to be too close. He feels the two-gallon plantings at
24” centers will be fine.
The motion was amended by Joe
Freeman as follows:
Motion was made by Don Kimble
to approve the site plan as presented with the following conditions:
1. Any monument sign placed
in the future, if different than the one presented at this time, will be
brought for review before the Site Plan Review Committee and if the presented
monument sign is not installed now, landscaping will be done now.
2. The one-gallon size
planting will be increased to two-gallon size and the two-gallon spacing will
be placed at 24” centers, not 12” centers.
3. The placement of the two
Austrian Pine and two Oak trees on the west side of the proposed site may be
rearranged.
Gary Israel seconded the motion. The motion carried
5-0.
|